In a shocking twist that’s reignited long-simmering speculation, royal watchdogs are now pointing to Lilibet Diana’s birth certificate...
In a shocking twist that’s reignited long-simmering speculation, royal watchdogs are now pointing to Lilibet Diana’s birth certificate code as “irrefutable evidence” that something may be gravely amiss in the official narrative surrounding Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s children.
The claim? That the births of Archie and Lilibet have never been properly verified, and constitutional requirements for inclusion in the line of succession may not have been met. If true, this could have explosive implications for the monarchy.
For years, critics have questioned the
Now, newly circulated official registry codes and legal references have reportedly triggered alarm among royal legal scholars, suggesting that key elements required to secure Lilibet’s place in the line of succession may be missing, altered, or concealed.
“The birth certificate doesn’t pass a constitutional smell test,” one commentator noted.
“There’s no evidence of who physically gave birth. That’s a mandatory requirement when it comes to royal succession. This is not just a family issue—it’s a matter of national record.”
Doubts were raised years ago when it was claimed that Meghan gave birth to Archie in a bathtub, under two epidurals, and walked out of the room barely an hour later—a scenario doctors and mothers alike deemed “medically implausible.”
“It was presented like a fairytale,” one insider said.
“But fairytales don’t come with government scrutiny or constitutional consequences.”
The skepticism only intensified when Dr. Melissa Drake, the obstetrician listed as assisting with Lilibet’s birth, abruptly shut down her private practice shortly after—citing vague personal reasons. Her husband’s ownership of a fertility clinic has since raised even more eyebrows.
What fuels the fire even more is the Palace’s refusal to release or confirm any medical details regarding the births, which stands in sharp contrast to past royal transparency—particularly with Prince William and Princess Catherine.
“Why is no one asking why these two children’s birth details are clouded in secrecy?” one royal historian asked.
“When it comes to the monarchy and the line of succession, transparency isn’t optional. It’s constitutional.”
The latest claims suggest the Palace may have deliberately looked the other way to avoid further rifts with the Sussexes, even if it meant bending royal tradition and legal precedent. The fact that Lilibet was named against the Queen’s alleged wishes only adds to the perception of Meghan deliberately defying protocol.
“If this were anyone else, the public would demand answers,” said one former courtier.
“But it’s Meghan—and for years, the media has been afraid to touch the truth.”
With growing pressure from royal analysts, constitutional scholars, and the public, many are now calling on the UK Parliament or the Church of England to officially review the legitimacy of the births and the children’s current positions in the line of succession.
Whether this leads to a formal investigation remains to be seen, but one thing is clear:
The fairytale is cracking—and behind the glittering façade may lie one of the monarchy’s most uncomfortable truths.
